Skip to content
Membrane-enhanced hybrid refinery in Virginia where Petro Sep pervaporation systems are deployed.

PV · Technology

Pervaporation

Pervaporation separates miscible liquid mixtures by selective sorption and diffusion through a dense polymeric membrane. Unlike distillation, it ignores boiling points; the separation is driven by chemistry, not temperature. That makes it the only practical option for breaking azeotropes such as ethanol/water above 95.6%, or for recovering solvents from water at near-ambient temperature.

What it solves

Performance you can size against.

The outcomes below come from commissioned systems and verified pilots, not theoretical limits. Every number is independently testable on your own feed.

Solvent recovery rate
98 to 99.8%
Verified on ethanol, isopropanol, methanol, and acetonitrile.
Energy vs distillation
1/4 to 1/2
No phase change penalty; runs near ambient temperature.
Azeotropes broken
Including ethanol/water (95.6% azeotrope), IPA/water, and acetonitrile/water.
Footprint vs entrainer distillation
1/2 to 1/3
No third stream, no recycle column, no entrainer storage.

How it works

The working principle.

A liquid feed contacts a dense polymeric membrane. The target component (water, or a specific organic) sorbs into the membrane and diffuses through. A vacuum or sweep gas on the permeate side keeps the driving gradient steep. The permeate condenses as a separate phase. The retentate continues through the system at progressively higher purity.

Performance envelope

Specs and operating range.

For preliminary sizing only. Production sizing is always validated against your specific feed.

Permeate purity (water from solvent)
>99.5wt%
Solvent purity at retentate
Up to 99.95wt%
Operating temperature
30 to 80°CStays liquid; no boiling required.
Operating pressure (feed side)
1 to 4bar
Specific energy
100 to 200kWh/m³ feed
Membrane life (typical)
2 to 5years
Footprint vs entrainer column
1/3 to 1/2

How we compare

PV vs the alternatives.

Where Pervaporation wins, where it does not, and where the alternatives are honestly the better fit.

Breaks azeotropes

Pervaporation

Yes, by chemistry not boiling point

Azeotropic Distillation

Yes, requires entrainer (benzene, cyclohexane)

Molecular Sieves

Yes, for low water content only

Final purity ceiling

Pervaporation

>99.95 wt% solvent achievable

Azeotropic Distillation

>99.5 wt% with entrainer recycle

Molecular Sieves

Limited by adsorbent regeneration

Energy

Pervaporation

100 to 200 kWh/m³, no phase change

Azeotropic Distillation

300 to 600 kWh/m³, multi-column

Molecular Sieves

200 to 400 kWh/m³ including regeneration

Footprint

Pervaporation

Compact skid

Azeotropic Distillation

Large column train + entrainer system

Molecular Sieves

Twin-bed system with regeneration loop

Best fit

Pervaporation

Solvent dehydration, azeotrope breaking, GMP environments

Azeotropic Distillation

Very high volume, established plants

Molecular Sieves

Final polish from <1% water content

Engineering FAQ

Questions engineers ask.

The questions we hear weekly. If you have a different one, send it with your consultation request and we will answer it directly.

What solvents can pervaporation handle?
We have run ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, butanol, acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, MEK, MIBK, and several proprietary solvents. The deciding factor is the membrane chemistry; we run a bench validation on every new solvent before sizing.
Why pervaporation over distillation?
Three reasons: it breaks azeotropes that distillation cannot (without an entrainer), it runs near ambient temperature so it suits heat-sensitive solvents, and it uses 1/4 to 1/2 the energy of distillation on the same separation.
Can pervaporation make GMP-grade solvent?
Yes. We have shipped systems for pharmaceutical operators with full IQ/OQ/PQ documentation, materials traceability, and validation support. The membrane chemistry is non-leaching; the wetted-parts list is fully GMP-compatible.
What about water content above 50%?
Pervaporation works best when the target component is the minority. Above 50% water, recovery becomes uneconomic; we usually recommend a distillation polish first, then pervaporation for the final azeotrope break.
Membrane life expectancy?
Typically 2 to 5 years on real industrial feeds, depending on solvent and operating temperature. Replacement is module-by-module so plants stay online.

Have a feed that PV
might fit?

We will pilot before we promise. Send us a sample and a target outcome. If the technology fits, we will tell you what to expect; if it does not, we will tell you that too.